![Pant :pant:](./images/smilies/pant.gif)
Also I'm guessing the number of tromboners would be fewer than pianists, violins, flutes, etc.
Hmmm.
Yeah, but a lot of people in Asia learn violin too, and correct me if I'm wrong, but they tend to do more solo pieces? so not necessarily in orchestras.
Yeah Steven, that sounds about right - 20% tromboning frequency. So extrapolating to the U.S. population of 325 million, there must be about 65 million trombonists within the U.S borders!
I don't think there are more people playing trombone than violin, mostly because of youth and community orchestras, but also Asia.JohnL wrote: ↑Wed Aug 29, 2018 8:50 pm Actively playing or people who played the instrument at one time?
I expect there are more people overall actively playing trombone than violin (amateur, pro, and students). More school bands than orchestras, more amateur bands than amateur orchestras. More flutes than trombones. Probably more pianists, too, but that would be counting “occasional” players (lots of people own keyboards and play “once in a while”).
In our local school district, both the high school and middle school band directors are trombone players. Do they count?Mikebmiller wrote: ↑Thu Aug 30, 2018 6:04 pm I think a better question would be "how many people in the USA actually make a full time living playing and/or teaching trombone. I would guess that that number would be somewhere under 1,000.
Does that include you?
Oops! You're right.
Actually, many of the band directors I know that started life as trombone players rarely play much any more. These folks have music degrees, but I can play circles around some of them. So the rub is that you go into music as a profession because you are talented at an instrument, but you end up spending your days running marching band practice for 3 hours and never have time to actually play that instrument.