Quote from: BGuttman on Yesterday at 11:09 AMIt's part of the work and for illustration.
Had he posted the whole work for free, that's a copyright violation.
Come on, Bruce. That scan doesn't meet ANY of the tests to qualify as fair use, and you know it.
As a mod, if you want to give it a pass, that's your privilege, but don't throw out some completely BS "logic" to salve you conscience.
Quote from: Zandit75 on Yesterday at 04:19 PMDoes copyright exist, when it's freely available on Google images?
I'm not trying to start any trouble here, I'm just curious to know how the law sits with that.
The copyright exists and continues to remain in force until it expires (life of composer + 50 or 70 years, depending on country), or until the copyright holder explicitly places it in the public domain.
Some copyright holders grant publishers and/or vendors permission to post excerpts of their work in order to encourage sales, but the permission does not affect the validity or enforceablility of the copyright. The fact that you can VIEW an image the excerpt on a publisher or vendor's website does NOT grant you permission to reproduce (copy) or republish (post) the image elsewhere.