1942 New York Bach 36

Post Reply
DrTbone43
Posts: 81
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 11:56 am
Location: Holland,Michigan

1942 New York Bach 36

Post by DrTbone43 »

Question for the Bach experts. Did the early New York Bach 36 have a larger bell or a deeper bell than the 36's produced today? I have a stone lined cup mute that is too small for my NY bell. But other 36's I've owned worked and fitted fine. Any ideas?
Dennis
Posts: 308
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 6:23 pm
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA

Re: 1942 New York Bach 36

Post by Dennis »

There were some 36's made with an 8½ inch bell diameter. Jimmy Knepper played one. But as far as I know, the mandrel was the same as the later Model 36. Bach was doing lots of experimenting during this period, and he tracked it pretty carefully with his shop cards, so I tend to believe that the mandrel was kept constant.
GabrielRice
Posts: 1130
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 7:20 am
Location: Boston, MA, USA
Contact:

Re: 1942 New York Bach 36

Post by GabrielRice »

You should be able to get a copy of the shop card for your specific instrument from Bach. It would say if the bell mandrel was different from the standard.
hornbuilder
Posts: 1043
Joined: Wed May 02, 2018 9:20 pm

Re: 1942 New York Bach 36

Post by hornbuilder »

Note that the modern 36 and 42 use the same bell mandrel. So mutes that fit one should fit the other. (Piling on saying) Your bell may have been made on a different.mandrel
Matthew Walker
Owner/Craftsman, M&W Custom Trombones, LLC, Jackson, Wisconsin.
Former Bass Trombonist, Opera Australia, 1991-2006
RJMason
Posts: 209
Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2018 2:04 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Re: 1942 New York Bach 36

Post by RJMason »

The design was not necessarily codified back then. I’ve seen 8 inch, 7.75 inch, 8.25 inch, 8.5 inch. Most fit tenor mutes, probably a similar mandrel as today, however some only fit bass trombone mutes. I had a model 30, which was .515/.525 dual bore, I think the mandrel was the same as the Bach 45, bell made to 8 inch instead of 9.
User avatar
Doug Elliott
Posts: 3443
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2018 10:12 pm
Location: Maryand

Re: 1942 New York Bach 36

Post by Doug Elliott »

I bet that was an interesting horn
"I know a thing or two because I've seen a thing or two."
ngrinder
Posts: 253
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2018 7:30 pm
Location: New York City
Contact:

Re: 1942 New York Bach 36

Post by ngrinder »

I think they were looser with everything back then. I've got 6 NY 11Cs at the moment and they're *all* wildly different.
OneTon
Posts: 666
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2021 11:44 am

Re: 1942 New York Bach 36

Post by OneTon »

My 42G and 42AG bells use bass trombone mutes. The 36 bell I have with fittings to match Shires uses a tenor mute. Bach’s shop was a post Industrial Revolution Burger King. It appears that Bach would build anything anyone wanted, not unlike Leo Fender’s G & L shop that followed the sale of Fender operations.
Richard Smith
Wichita, Kansas
DrTbone43
Posts: 81
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 11:56 am
Location: Holland,Michigan

Re: 1942 New York Bach 36

Post by DrTbone43 »

Thank you folks for your insight. The 36 is in the 10XX serial #. Apparently many of the early NY Bachs had no model numbers stamped. Much experimenting was taking place within the corporation. My mandrel # is 451 on the bell. Slide has no slide lock. Actually a great playing trombone.
It's a keeper. Thanks all.
User avatar
elmsandr
Posts: 1087
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 2:43 pm
Location: S.E. Michigan
Contact:

Re: 1942 New York Bach 36

Post by elmsandr »

414 is the usual 36/42 bell mandrel

I know I’ve seen 451 on other bells, but not sure off the top of my head where.

446 is the 34 bell mandrel
465 is the 45/46 bell mandrel
453 is the 50 bell mandrel

Cheers,
Andy
User avatar
dukesboneman
Posts: 738
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2018 4:40 pm
Location: Sarasota, Florida
Contact:

Re: 1942 New York Bach 36

Post by dukesboneman »

Doug, I played that above mentioned Bach 30 before it was sold.
I would have bought it if I had the $$$
It played so nice and easy
User avatar
Matt K
Verified
Posts: 4309
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2018 10:34 pm
Contact:

Re: 1942 New York Bach 36

Post by Matt K »

I can totally see that. I had a set of components for awhile on the Shires side that was a 9" bell with a 508/525. Man that was a great setup.5
octavposaune
Posts: 120
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2018 1:41 pm

Re: 1942 New York Bach 36

Post by octavposaune »

451 is the 40B mandrel which is very similar to 45 bells, much as the 34 446 mandrel is nearly the same as the 36/42 414 mandrel.

Benn
User avatar
elmsandr
Posts: 1087
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 2:43 pm
Location: S.E. Michigan
Contact:

Re: 1942 New York Bach 36

Post by elmsandr »

After a little digging, yup… on 30 and 40 marked bells and the unmodel marked “B” that Noah had….
s-l1600 (1).jpeg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Tbarh
Posts: 431
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2018 12:59 pm

Re: 1942 New York Bach 36

Post by Tbarh »

octavposaune wrote: Fri May 31, 2024 5:11 am 451 is the 40B mandrel which is very similar to 45 bells, much as the 34 446 mandrel is nearly the same as the 36/42 414 mandrel.

Benn
So the 40B and 45B mandrels are different ?
User avatar
elmsandr
Posts: 1087
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2018 2:43 pm
Location: S.E. Michigan
Contact:

Re: 1942 New York Bach 36

Post by elmsandr »

Tbarh wrote: Sun Jun 02, 2024 2:08 am
octavposaune wrote: Fri May 31, 2024 5:11 am 451 is the 40B mandrel which is very similar to 45 bells, much as the 34 446 mandrel is nearly the same as the 36/42 414 mandrel.

Benn
So the 40B and 45B mandrels are different ?
Yes, as I noted above, the 465 is the usual mandrel for bells marked 45 or 46.

Cheers,
Andy
Post Reply

Return to “Instruments”