If so how are you finding it?
I'd be grateful for any reviews as we in lil ole UK don't have much chance to test one.
Thanks in advance
![Hi :hi:](./images/smilies/hi.gif)
Do you think it was sterile due to it being brand new?hyperbolica wrote: ↑Tue Apr 26, 2022 5:38 am If there is a criticism, it's possibly a little sterile, but some people like that.
Leave the original alone, obviously, but if it's basically a mechanical issue have you tried sticking a new 3B slide on your old bell? (Leadpipes might have changed, etc, but it's a cheap experiment.)
No, it's just that I'm a Conn/Olds guy with that sound stuck in my head, and the new horns are nice, but don't have the warmth in the sound as the older instruments. Also, I only owned it for a few months, so I didn't allow for the horn changing my tastes. I also had a 891z. That was the best Yamaha I've ever played, but I'm not a huge Yamaha fan. I think one of the Rath variations would be a real killer horn. The R3 I played was probably my all-time favorite horn.Fidbone wrote: ↑Tue Apr 26, 2022 6:42 amDo you think it was sterile due to it being brand new?hyperbolica wrote: ↑Tue Apr 26, 2022 5:38 am If there is a criticism, it's possibly a little sterile, but some people like that.
Did you try both lead pipes?
I have had a 1632 for about 9 months now, yes it's a very fine horn. Perhaps a little bit too light and I tend to overfill it. Not even seen or heard a 1634 over here yet.
Thoughts?
Been practicing for 45 years mate
Mate, you’ve posted over 3200 times on the forum, that’s some serious practice time right there
Spoke to Ed, on Saturday. No they don't but it should come in sometime this month!Vegasbound wrote: ↑Sun May 01, 2022 4:33 am
FYI Phil Parkers now have the Marshall Gilkes in stock too!